Validated functional tests in hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals: systematic review

Main Article Content

Natasha Cordeiro dos Santos
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3062-0126
Neila Silva Soares
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3279-7547
Jorge Luis Motta dos Anjos
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2897-9858
Bruno Souza de Matos
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2880-7159
Daiane Barros Carvalho
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7186-9489

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a systematic review of the functional tests validated in different profiles of hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals and to evaluate the psychometric evidence for reliability and validity. Methods: This is a systematic review. The databases EMBASE, MEDLINE, Lilacs and SciELO were used with the descriptors Functional Tests (Walk Test, Gait Speed ​​Test, Chair Stand Test, Timed Up and Go, Step Test), Validation Studies as Topic and synonyms. Validation studies of functional tests were included in hospitalized or non-hospitalized individuals who used the criteria of validity and/or reliability and related the tests to different variables. These articles could be longitudinal or cross-sectional observational or validation studies that used data from clinical trials. Articles that did not present significant characteristics of the sample and the description of the test were excluded. Results: The search resulted in 36,150 articles, and 89 were included. The studies were organized in tables with information such as author, year, validation criteria, sample, test, associated variables and results. The quality of the articles was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Conclusion: Functional tests are valid and reliable for assessing hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals and are associated with muscle strength, ability to walk, postural control, activities of daily living, risk of falls, hospitalization, and mortality.



Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Santos NC dos, Soares NS, Anjos JLM dos, Matos BS de, Carvalho DB. Validated functional tests in hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals: systematic review. HSJ [Internet]. 2020Dec.4 [cited 2024May18];10(4):23-. Available from: https://portalrcs.hcitajuba.org.br/index.php/rcsfmit_zero/article/view/960
Section
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Author Biographies

Natasha Cordeiro dos Santos, Roberto Santos General Hospital. Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

Physiotherapist by the State University of Bahia (UNEB). Received a scholarship from the Scientific Initiation Program of the State of Bahia Foundation for Research Support (Fapesb) by UNEB. She is currently Resident in the Physiotherapy Program in Intensive Care and Emergency at the State Health Department of Bahia (SESAB) and Master's student in Pharmaceutical Sciences at UNEB.

Neila Silva Soares, Roberto Santos General Hospital. Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

Graduation in Physiotherapy at the State University of Bahia (UEB). Specialist in Hospital Physiotherapy with Emphasis on Intensive Care by the Bahia State Department of Health (SESAB) Residence Program - Hospital Cidade. She is currently a Physiotherapist at the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit of  Roberto Santos General Hospital and preceptor of the Physiotherapy Residency in Intensive Care and Emergency at SESAB.

Jorge Luis Motta dos Anjos, Roberto Santos General Hospital. Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

Graduated in Physiotherapy at Faculdade Adventista de Fisioterapia (2003), Specialist in Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy at Faculdade Gama Filho (2005) and Master in Technologies Applicable to Bioenergy by FTC in Salvador in the line of research in Occupational Health (2016). Professor at Faculdade Maurício de Nassau in Salvador/BA, Professor of Postgraduate Program in Hospital Physiotherapy at Faculdade Social da Bahia, Physiotherapist Member of the Teaching Coordination at Roberto Santos General Hospital in Salvador,BA and PhD Student in Medicine and Human Health at UFBA.

Bruno Souza de Matos, Roberto Santos General Hospital. Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

Physiotherapist at Jorge Amado University Centre. Received a scholarship of the Scientific Initiation Program 2016/2017 with the Project "Cardiac Rehabilitation in Hypertensive Adults". He is currently Resident in the Physiotherapy Program in Intensive Care and Emergency at Roberto Santos General Hospital by the Health Department of the State of Bahia (SESAB).

Daiane Barros Carvalho, Woman's Hospital - Maria Luzia Costa dos Santos. Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

Physiotherapist by the State University of Bahia (UNEB). Intensive Physiotherapist at the Woman's Hospital Maria Luzia Costa dos Santos and at the Municipal Hospital of Salvador/BA. Currently at Specialization in Hospital Physiotherapy at the Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health (EMNSP). Held the Improvement Course in Hospital Physiotherapy at the Woman's Hospital.

References

1. Hajat C, Stein E. The global burden of multiple chronic conditions: A narrative review. Prev Med Rep. 2018;12:284-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.008 PMid:30406006 PMCid:PMC6214883
2. Parry SM, Huang M, Needham DM. Evaluating physical functioning in critical care: considerations for clinical practice and Research. Critical Care. 2017;21:249. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1827-6 PMid:28978333 PMCid:PMC5628423
3. Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiol Serv Saúde. 2017;26(3):649-59. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022 PMid:28977189
4. Polit DF, Beck CT. Fundamentos de pesquisa em enfermagem: métodos, avaliação e utilização (7th Ed). Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2011.
5. National Institute of Health. Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies [Internet Site]. 2017 [cited 2020 Oct 31]. Avaiable from: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools
6. Boer PH, Moss SJ. Validity of the 16-metre PACER and six-minute walk test in adults with Down Syndrome. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(26):2575-83. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1137982 PMid:26860699
7. Bois RM, Weycker D, Albera C, Bradford WZ, Costabel U, Kartashov A, et al. Six-minute-walk test in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: test validation and minimal clinically important difference. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(9):1231-7. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201007-1179OC PMid:21131468
8. Buch MH, Denton CP, Furst DE, Guillevin L, Rubin LJ, Wells AU, et al. Submaximal exercise testing in the assessment of interstitial lung disease secondary to systemic sclerosis: reproducibility and correlations of the 6-min walk test. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(2):169-73. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2006.054866 PMid:16868020 PMCid:PMC1798506
9. Chan KS, Pfoh ER, Denehy L, Elliott D, Holland AE, Dinglas VD, et al. Construct validity and minimal important difference of 6-minute walk distance in survivors of acute respiratory failure. Chest. 2015;147(5):1316-26. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.14-1808 PMid:25742048 PMCid:PMC4420183
10. Chan AW, Pinb TW. Reliability, validity and minimal detectable change of 2-minute walk test, 6-minute walk test and 10-meter walk test in frail older adults with dementia. Exp Gerontol. 2019;115:9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2018.11.001 PMid:30423359
11. Chen YC, Chen KC, Lu LH, Wu YL, Lai TJ, Wang CY. Validating the 6-minute walk test as an indicator of recovery in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. A prospective cohort study. Medicine. 2018;97(42):e12925. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012925 PMid:30335028 PMCid:PMC6211883
12. Demers C, McKelvie RS, Negassa A, Yusuf S. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the six-minute walk test in patients with heart failure. Am Heart J. 2001;142(4):698-703. https://doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2001.118468 PMid:11579362
13. Dunaway YS, Montes J, Kramer SS, Marra J, Salazar R, Cruz R, et al. Six-minute walk test is reliable and valid in spinal muscular atrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2016;54(5):836-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.25120 PMid:27015431
14. Eichinger K, Heatwole C, Heininger S, Stinson N, Matichak Stock C, Grosmann C, et al. Validity of the 6 minute walk test in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2017;55(3):333-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.25251 PMid:27421252 PMCid:PMC5793210
15. Elmahgoub SS, Van De Velde A, Peersman W, Cambier D, Calders P. Reproducibility, validity and predictors of six-minute walk test in overweight and obese adolescents with intellectual disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(10):846-51. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.623757 PMid:22149772
16. Fiss AL, Jeffries L, Yocum A, Westcott MS. Validity of the Early Activity Scale for Endurance and the 6-Minute Walk Test for Children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2019;31(2):156-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000577 PMid:30865148
17. Fulk GD, Echternach JL, Nof L, O'Sullivan S. Clinometric properties of the six-minute walk test in individuals undergoing rehabilitation poststroke. Physiother Theory Pract. 2008;24(3):195-04. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593980701588284 PMid:18569856
18. Guerra BM, Oviedo GR, Javierre C, Fortuño J, Barnet-López S, Niño O, et al. Reliability and validity of the 6-min walk test in adults and seniors with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2015;47:144-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.09.011 PMid:26426514
19. Gomes E, Bastos T, Probst M, Ribeiro JC, Silva G, Corredeira R. Reliability and validity of 6MWT for outpatients with schizophrenia: A preliminary study. Psychiatry Res. 2016; 237:37-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.01.066 PMid:26921049
20. Gulmans VA, Van Veldhoven NH, De Meer K, Helders PJ. The six-minute walking test in children with cystic fibrosis: reliability and validity. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1996; 22(2):85-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199608)22:2<85::AID-PPUL1>3.0.CO;2-I
21. Kobayashi E, Himuro N, Takahashi M. Clinical utility of the 6-min walk test for patients with moderate Parkinson's disease. Int J Rehabil Res. 2017;40(1):66-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000205 PMid:27977464
22. Larsson EU, Reynisdottir S. The six-minute walk test in outpatients with obesity: reproducibility and known group validity. Physiother Res Int. 2008;13(2):84-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.398 PMid:18446882
23. Lee MC. Validity of the 6-minute walk test and step test for evaluation of cardio respiratory fitness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Exerc Nutrition Biochem. 2018;22(1):49-55. https://doi.org/10.20463/jenb.2018.0008 PMid:29673246 PMCid:PMC5909078
24. Li AM, Yin J, Yu CC, Tsang T, So HK, Wong E, et al. The six-minute walk test in healthy children: reliability and validity. Eur Respir J. 2005;25(6):1057-60. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.05.00134904 PMid:15929962
25. Liu WY, Meijer K, Delbressine JM, Willems PJ, Franssen FM, Wouters EF, et al. Reproducibility and validity of the 6-Minute Walk Test using the Gait Real-Time Analysis Interactive Lab in patients with COPD and healthy elderly. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0162444. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162444 PMid:27607426 PMCid:PMC5015964
26. Mänttäri A, Suni J, Sievänen H, Husu P, Vähä-Ypyä H, Valkeinen H, et al. Six-minute walk test: a tool for predicting maximal aerobic power (VO2 max) in healthy adults. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12525 PMid:29851229
27. Mcdonald CM, Henricson EK, Abresch RT, Florence J, Eagle M, Gappmaier E, et al. The 6-minute walk test and other clinical endpoints in duchenne muscular dystrophy: reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal clinically important differences from a multicenter study. Muscle Nerve. 2013;48(3):357-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.23905 PMid:23674289 PMCid:PMC3826053
28. Moriello C, Mayo NE, Feldman L, Carli F. Validating the six-minute walk test as a measure of recovery after elective colon resection surgery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(6):1083-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.031 PMid:18503803
29. Morinder G, Mattsson E, Sollander C, Marcus C, Larsson UE. Six-minute walk test in obese children and adolescents: reproducibility and validity. Physiother Res Int. 2009;14(2):91-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.428 PMid:19003813
30. Mossberg KA, Fortini E. Responsiveness and validity of the six-minute walk test in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Phys Ther. 2012; 92(5):726-33. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20110157 PMid:22282772 PMCid:PMC3345338
31. Nasuti G, Stuart-Hill L, Temple VA. The Six-Minute Walk Test for adults with intellectual disability: a study of validity and reliability. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2013;38(1):31-8. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2012.748885 PMid:23244742
32. Nathan SD, du Bois RM, Albera C, Bradford WZ, Costabel U, Kartashov A, et al. Validation of test performance characteristics and minimal clinically important difference of the 6-minute walk test in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Med. 2015;109(7):914-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2015.04.008 PMid:25956020
33. Nsenga LA, Shephard RJ, Ahmaidi S. Six-minute walk test in children with cerebral palsy gross motor function classification system levels I and II: reproducibility, validity, and training effects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(12):2333-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.06.005 PMid:22721868
34. Pankoff B, Overend T, Lucy D, White K. Validity and responsiveness of the 6 minute walk test for people with fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(11):2666-70.
35. Pecorelli N, Fiore JF, Gillis C, Awasthi R, Mappin-Kasirer B, Niculiseanu P, et al. The six-minute walk test as a measure of postoperative recovery after colorectal resection: further examination of its measurement properties. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(6):2199-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4478-1 PMid:26310528
36. Phillips D, Tomazos LC, Moseley S, L'italien G, Silva HG, Lara SL. Reliability and validity of the 6-Minute Walk Test in hypophosphatasia. JBMR Plus. 2019;3(6):e10131. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10131 PMid:31346563 PMCid:PMC6636775
37. Ries JD, Echternach JL, Nof L, Blodgett MG. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change scores for the Timed "Up & Go" Test, the Six-Minute Walk Test, and Gait Speed in people with Alzheimer Disease. Phys Ther. 2009;89(6):569-79. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080258 PMid:19389792
38. Sandberg A, Cider Å, Jivegård L, Nordanstig J, Wittboldt S, Bäck M. Test-retest reliability, agreement, and minimal detectable change in the 6-minute walk test in patients with intermittent claudication. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71(1):197-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.056 PMid:31147129
39. Sanjak M, Langford V, Holsten S, Rozario N, Patterson CGM, Bravver E, et al. Six-Minute Walk Test as a measure of walking capacity in ambulatory individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(11):2301-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.04.004 PMid:28465220
40. Schmidt K, Vogt L, Thiel C, Jäger E, Banzer W. Validity of the six-minute walk test in cancer patients. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34(7):631-6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1323746 PMid:23444095
41. Scivoletto G, Tamburella F, Laurenza L, Foti C, Ditunno JF, Molinari M. Validity and reliability of the 10-m walk test and the 6-min walk test in spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord. 2011;49(6):736-40. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2010.180 PMid:21221120
42. Sinclair RCF, Batterham AM, Davies S, Cawthorn L, Danjoux GR. Validity of the 6 min walk test in prediction of the anaerobic threshold before major non-cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(1):30-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer322 PMid:21980122
43. Stellmann JP, Neuhaus A, Götze N, Briken S, Lederer C, Schimpl M, et al. Ecological validity of walking capacity tests in multiple sclerosis. PloS One. 2015;10(4):e0123822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123822 PMid:25879750 PMCid:PMC4399985
44. Takken T, Engelbert R, Van Bergen M, Groothoff J, Nauta J, Van Hoeck K, et al. Six-minute walking test in children with ESRD: discrimination validity and construct validity. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009;24(11):2217-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-009-1259-x PMid:19633871 PMCid:PMC2753769
45. Uszko-Lencer NHMK, Mesquita R, Janssen E, Werter C, Brunner-La RHP, Pitta F, et al. Reliability, construct validity and determinants of 6-minute walk test performance in patients with chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2017;240:285-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.109 PMid:28377186
46. Vanhelst J, Fardy PS, Salleron J, Béghin L. The six-minute walk test in obese youth: reproducibility, validity, and prediction equation to assess aerobic power. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(6):479-82. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.699581 PMid:22779759
47. Vis JC, Thoonsen H, Duffels MG, De Bruin-Bom RA, Huisman SA, Van Dijk AP, et al. Six-minute walk test in patients with Down syndrome: validity and reproducibility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(8):1423-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.015 PMid:19651279
48. Arjunan A, Peel NM, Hubbard RE. Gait speed and frailty status in relation to adverse outcomes in geriatric rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(5):859-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.08.187 PMid:30312596
49. Bloem AEM, Veltkamp M, Spruit MA, Custers JWH, Bakker EWP, Dolk HM, et al. Validation of 4-meter-gait-speed test and 5-repetitions-sit-to-stand test in patients with pulmonary fibrosis: a clinimetric validation study. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2018;35(4):317-326. doi: https://doi.org/10.36141/svdld.v35i4.7035
50. Boonstra AM, Fidler V, Eisma WH. Walking speemtmmkubjects and amputees: aspects of validity of gait analysis. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1993;17(2):78-82. https://doi.org/10.3109/03093649309164360 PMid:8233772
51. Combs AS, Diehl MD, Filip J, Long E. Short-distance walking speed tests in people with Parkinson disease: Reliability, responsiveness, and validity. Gait Posture. 2014;39(2):784-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.10.019 PMid:24246801
52. Dolmage TE, Evans RA, Goldstein RS. Validity of measurement in patients with severe chronic lung disease, including prognostic and practical implications. CHEST. 2017;153(5):1101-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.11.024 PMid:29222008
53. Kim HJ, Park Y, Lee HJ. The reliability and validity of gait speed with different walking pace and distances against general health, physical function, and chronic disease in aged adults. J Exerc Nutrition Biochem. 2016;20(3):46-50. https://doi.org/10.20463/jenb.2016.09.20.3.7 PMid:27757387 PMCid:PMC5067420
54. Kon SS, Patel MS, Canavan JL, Clark AL, Jones SE, Nolan CM, et al. Reliability and validity of 4-metre gait speed in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2013;42(2):333-40. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00162712 PMid:23222875
55. Nolan CM, Maddocks M, Maher TM, Canavan JL, Jones SE, Barker RE, et al. Phenotypic characteristics associated with slow gait speed in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respirology. 2018;23(5):498-506. https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.13213 PMid:29139195
56. Peters DM, Fritz SL, Krotish DE. Assessing the reliability and validity of a shorter walk test compared with the 10-Meter Walk Test for measurements of gait speed in healthy, older adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2013;36(1):24-30. https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0b013e318248e20d PMid:22415358
57. Reychler G, Audag N, Dewulf S, Morale MN, Caty G. Validation of 6 min step test and 4-m gait speed in children: A randomized cross-over study. Gait Posture. 2018;61:19-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.12.011 PMid:29289866
58. Van Loo MA, Moseley AM, Bosman JM, De Bie RA, Hassett L. Inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of walking speed measurement after traumatic brain injury. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(7):775-9. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215503cr677oa PMid:14606745
59. Arcuri JF, Borghi-Silva A, Labadessa IG, Sentanin AC, Candolo C, Pires Di Lorenzo VA. Validity and reliability of the 6-Minute Step Test in healthy individuals: a cross-sectional study. Clin J Sport Med. 2016;26(1):69-75. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000190 PMid:25706661
60. Bonnevie T, Allingham M, Prieur G, Combret Y, Debeaumont D, Patout M, et al. The six-minute stepper test is related to muscle strength but cannot substitute for the one repetition maximum to prescribe strength training in patients with COPD. International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2019;14:767-774. https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S193585 PMid:30992662 PMCid:PMC6445245
61. Chung MM, Chan RW, Fung, YK, Fong SS, Lam SS, Lai CW, et al. Reliability and validity of Alternate Step Test times in subjects with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(10):969-74. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1877 PMid:25167536
62. Cooney JK, Moore JP, Ahmad YA, Jones JG, Lemmey AB, Casanova F, et al. A simple step test to estimate cardio-respiratory fitness levels of rheumatoid arthritis patients in a clinical setting. Int J Rheumatol. 2013;2013:174541. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/174541 PMid:24454385 PMCid:PMC3884971
63. Hayes RM, Maldonado D, Gossett T, Shepherd T, Mehta SP, Flesher SL. Developing and validating a step test of aerobic fitness among elementary school children. Physiother Can. 2019;71(2):187-94. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2017-44.pp PMid:31040514 PMCid:PMC6484966
64. Hong SJ, Goh EY, Chua SY, Ng SS. Reliability and validity of step test scores in subjects with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(6):1065-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.022 PMid:22475055
65. Knight E, Stuckey MI, Petrella RJ. Validation of the Step Test and Exercise Prescription Tool for adults. Can J Diabetes, 2014;38(3):164-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.03.007 PMid:24909087
66. Miyamoto K, Takebayashi H, Takimoto K, Miyamoto S, Morioka S, Yagi F. A new simple performance test focused on agility in elderly people: The Ten Step Test. Gerontology. 2008;54(6):365-72. https://doi.org/10.1159/000146787 PMid:18645242
67. Pessoa BV, Arcuri JF, Labadessa IG, Costa JNF, Sentanin AC, Pires VA, et al. Validity of the six-minute step test of free cadence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014;18(3):228-36. https://doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0041 PMid:25003275 PMCid:PMC4183495
68. Di Thommazo-Luporini L, Carvalho LP, Luporini RL, Trimer R, Pantoni CB, Martinez AF, et al. Are cardiovascular and metabolic responses to field walking tests interchangeable and obesity-dependent? Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(18):1820-9. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1107645 PMid:26681386
69. Travensolo CF, Arcuri JF, Polito MD. Validity and reliability of the 6-min step test in individuals with coronary artery disease. Physiother Res Int. 2020;25(1):e1810. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1810 PMid:31599079
70. Bruun IH, Mogensen CB, Nørgaard B, Schiøttz-Christensen B, Maribo T. Validity and responsiveness to change of the 30-Second Chair-Stand Test in older adults admitted to an emergency department. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2019;42(4):265-74. https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000166 PMid:29227412
71. Crook S, Büsching G, Schultz K, Lehbert N, Jelusic D, Keusch S, et al. A multicentre validation of the 1-min sit-to-stand test in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(3):1601871. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01871-2016 PMid:28254766
72. Goldberg A, Chavis M, Watkins J, Wilson T. The five-times-sit-to-stand test: validity, reliability and detectable change in older females. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012;24(4):339-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325265 PMid:23238309
73. Jones JC, Rikli RE, Beam WC. A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1999;70(2):113-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1999.10608028 PMid:10380242
74. Jones SE, Kon SS, Canavan JL, Patel MS, Clark AL, Nolan CM, et al. The five-repetition sit-to-stand test as a functional outcome measure in COPD. Thorax. 2013;68(11):1015-20. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-203576 PMid:23783372
75. Kohlbrenner D, Benden C, Radtke T. The 1-minute sit-to-stand test in lung transplant candidates: an easy-to-use alternative to the 6-minute walk test? Respir Care. 2020;65(4):437-43. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.07124 PMid:31641072
76. Kumban W, Amatachaya S, Emasithi A, Siritaratiwat W. Five-times-sit-to-stand test in children with cerebral palsy: reliability and concurrent validity. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;32(1):9-15. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-130818 PMid:23422454
77. Mcallister LS, Palombaro KM. Modified 30-second sit-to-stand test: reliability and validity in older adults unable to complete traditional sit-to-stand testing. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2020;43(3):153-8. https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000227 PMid:30807554
78. Møller AB, Bibby BM, Skjerbæk AG, Jensen E, Sørensen H, Stenager E, et al. Validity and variability of the 5-repetition sit-to-stand test in patients with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(26):2251-8. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.683479 PMid:22612360
79. Mong Y, Teo TW, Ng SS. 5-repetition sit-to-stand test in subjects with chronic stroke: reliability and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(3):407-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.030 PMid:20298832
80. Nilsagård Y, Andreasson M, Carling A, Vesterlin H. Examining the validity and sensitivity to change of the 5 and 10 sit-to-stand tests in people with multiple sclerosis. Physiother Res Int. 2017;22(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1681 PMid:28044398
81. Staartjes VE, Schröder ML. The five-repetition sit-to-stand test: evaluation of a simple -and objective tool for the assessment of degenerative pathologies of the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;29(4):380-7. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.2.SPINE171416 PMid:29957147
82. Wang TH, Liao HF, Peng YC. Reliability and validity of the five-repetition sit-to-stand test for children with cerebral palsy. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(7):664-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215511426889 PMid:22080526
83. Botolfsen P, Helbostad JL, Moe-Nilssen R, Wall JC. Reliability and concurrent validity of the Expanded Timed Up-and-Go test in older people with impaired mobility. Physiother Res Int. 2008;13(2):94-106. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.394 PMid:18288773
84. Chan PP, Si Tou JI, Tse MM, Ng SS. Reliability and validity of the Timed Up and Go Test with a motor task in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(11):2213-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.008 PMid:28392324
85. Evensen NM, Kvåle A, Brækken IH. Convergent validity of the Timed Up and Go test and Ten-metre Timed Walk Test in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain. Manual Therapy, 2015; 21:94-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2015.06.002 PMid:26235131
86. Gautschi OP, Smoll NR, Corniola MV, Joswig H, Chau I, Hildebrandt G, et al. Validity and reliability of a measurement of objective functional impairment in lumbar degenerative disc disease: The Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test. Neurosurgery. 2016;79(2):270-7. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001195 PMid:26702840
87. Hwang R, Morris NR, Mandrusiak A, Mudge A, Suna J, Adsett J, et al. Timed Up and Go test: a reliable and valid test in patients with chronic heart failure. J Card Fail. 2016; 22(8):646-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.09.018 PMid:26456063
88. Kalron A, Dolev M, Givon U. Further construct validity of the Timed Up-and-Go Test as a measure of ambulation in multiple sclerosis patients. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(6):841-7. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04599-3
89. Kojima T, Ishikawa H, Tanaka S, Haga N, Nishida K, Yukioka M, et al. Validation and reliability of the Timed Up and Go test for measuring objective functional impairment in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study. Int J Rheum Dis. 2018;21(10):1793-800. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.13237 PMid:29210204
90. Mesquita R, Janssen DJ, Wouters EF, Schols JM, Pitta F, Spruit MA. Within-day test-retest reliability of the Timed Up & Go test in patients with advanced chronic organ failure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(11):2131-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.024 PMid:23583345
91. Nicolini-Panisson RD, Donadio MV. Normative values for the Timed 'Up and Go' test in children and adolescents and validation for individuals with Down syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56(5):490-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12290 PMid:24206424
92. Rolenz E, Reneker JC. Validity of the 8-Foot Up and Go, Timed Up and Go, and Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale in older adults with and without cognitive impairment. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(4):511-518. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2015.03.0042 PMid:27532337
93. Schoppen T, Boonstra A, Groothoff JW, De Vries J, Göeken LN, Eisma WH. The Timed "up and go" test: reliability and validity in persons with unilateral lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(7):825-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90234-4
94. Sebastião E, Sandroff BM, Learmonth YC, Motl RW. Validity of the Timed Up and Go Test as a measure of functional mobility in persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(7):1072-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.031 PMid:26944709
95. Ito T. Comprehensive physical function assessment in elderly people. Clin Phys Ther. 2017. https://doi.org/10.5772/67528
96. Christakou A, Papadopoulos E, Patsaki I, Sidiras G, Nanas S. Functional Assessment Scales in a General Intensive Care Unit. A Review. Hospital Chronicles. 2013;8(4):164-170.
97. Heresi GA, Dweik RA. Strengths and limitations of the Six-Minute-Walk Test: a model biomarker study in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(9):1122-4. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201012-2079ED PMid:21531951
98. Novaes RD, Miranda AS, Dourado VZ. Velocidade usual da marcha em brasileiros de meia idade e idosos. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011;15(2):117-22. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552011000200006 PMid:21789361
99. Keat BM, Guck TP, McGaha AL. Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test: normative reference values for ages 20 to 59 years and relationships with physical and mental health risk factors. J Prim Care Community Health. 2017;8(1):9-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150131916659282 PMid:27450179 PMCid:PMC5932649
100. Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT) [Internet]. Teste da Caminhada e do Degrau. Temas em revisão, 2011 [uploaded Dec 2011; cited 2020 Oct 31]. Avaiable from: http://itarget.com.br/newclients/sbpt.org.br/2011/downloads/arquivos/Revisoes/REVISAO_06_TESTE_CAMINHADA_DEGRAU.pdf