Testes funcionais validados em indivíduos hospitalizados e não hospitalizados: revisão sistemática
Barra lateral de artigos
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
Objetivo: Realizar uma revisão sistemática sobre os testes funcionais validados em diferentes perfis de indivíduos hospitalizados e não hospitalizados e avaliar as evidências psicométricas para confiabilidade e validade. Métodos: Trata-se de uma revisão sistemática. Foram utilizadas as bases de dados EMBASE, MEDLINE, Lilacs e SciELO com as palavras-chave Functional Tests (Walk Test, Gait Speed Test, Chair Stand Test, Timed Up And Go, Step Test),Validation Studies as Topic e sinônimos. Foram incluídos estudos de validação de testes funcionais em indivíduos hospitalizados ou não hospitalizados que utilizaram os critérios de validade e/ou confiabilidade e relacionaram os testes a diferentes variáveis. Esses artigos poderiam ser observacionais longitudinais ou de corte transversal ou estudos de validação que utilizaram dados de ensaios clínicos. Foram excluídos os artigos que não apresentaram características importantes da amostra e a descrição do teste. Resultados: A pesquisa resultou em 36.150 artigos, e 89 foram incluídos. Os estudos foram organizados em tabelas com informações como autor, ano; critérios de validação; amostra; teste; variáveis associadas; resultados. A qualidade dos artigos foi avaliada por meio da Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Conclusão: Os testes funcionais são válidos e confiáveis para a avaliação de indivíduos hospitalizados e não hospitalizados, estando associados à força muscular, capacidade de caminhar, controle postural, atividades de vida diária, risco de quedas, hospitalização e mortalidade.
Detalhes do artigo
Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem ao HSJ o direito de primeira publicação. A partir de 2024, as publicações serão licenciadas sob a Attribution 4.0 International 
, permitindo seu compartilhamento, reconhecendo a autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Os autores estão autorizados a assumir contratos adicionais separadamente para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (por exemplo, publicação em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Os autores são incentivados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho on-line (por exemplo, em repositórios institucionais ou em sua página pessoal) a qualquer momento após o processo editorial.
Além disso, o AUTOR fica informado e consente que o HSJ possa incorporar seu artigo em bases de dados e indexadores científicos existentes ou futuros, nas condições definidas por estes a cada momento, o que envolverá, pelo menos, a possibilidade de que os titulares de esses bancos de dados podem executar as seguintes ações no artigo.
Referências
Hajat C, Stein E. The global burden of multiple chronic conditions: A narrative review. Prev Med Rep. 2018;12:284-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.008 PMid:30406006 PMCid:PMC6214883
Parry SM, Huang M, Needham DM. Evaluating physical functioning in critical care: considerations for clinical practice and Research. Critical Care. 2017;21:249. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1827-6 PMid:28978333 PMCid:PMC5628423
Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiol Serv Saúde. 2017;26(3):649-59. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022 PMid:28977189
Polit DF, Beck CT. Fundamentos de pesquisa em enfermagem: métodos, avaliação e utilização (7th Ed). Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2011.
National Institute of Health. Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies [Internet Site]. 2017 [cited 2020 Oct 31]. Avaiable from: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools
Boer PH, Moss SJ. Validity of the 16-metre PACER and six-minute walk test in adults with Down Syndrome. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(26):2575-83. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1137982 PMid:26860699
Bois RM, Weycker D, Albera C, Bradford WZ, Costabel U, Kartashov A, et al. Six-minute-walk test in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: test validation and minimal clinically important difference. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(9):1231-7. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201007-1179OC PMid:21131468
Buch MH, Denton CP, Furst DE, Guillevin L, Rubin LJ, Wells AU, et al. Submaximal exercise testing in the assessment of interstitial lung disease secondary to systemic sclerosis: reproducibility and correlations of the 6-min walk test. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(2):169-73. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2006.054866 PMid:16868020 PMCid:PMC1798506
Chan KS, Pfoh ER, Denehy L, Elliott D, Holland AE, Dinglas VD, et al. Construct validity and minimal important difference of 6-minute walk distance in survivors of acute respiratory failure. Chest. 2015;147(5):1316-26. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.14-1808 PMid:25742048 PMCid:PMC4420183
Chan AW, Pinb TW. Reliability, validity and minimal detectable change of 2-minute walk test, 6-minute walk test and 10-meter walk test in frail older adults with dementia. Exp Gerontol. 2019;115:9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2018.11.001 PMid:30423359
Chen YC, Chen KC, Lu LH, Wu YL, Lai TJ, Wang CY. Validating the 6-minute walk test as an indicator of recovery in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. A prospective cohort study. Medicine. 2018;97(42):e12925. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012925 PMid:30335028 PMCid:PMC6211883
Demers C, McKelvie RS, Negassa A, Yusuf S. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the six-minute walk test in patients with heart failure. Am Heart J. 2001;142(4):698-703. https://doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2001.118468 PMid:11579362
Dunaway YS, Montes J, Kramer SS, Marra J, Salazar R, Cruz R, et al. Six-minute walk test is reliable and valid in spinal muscular atrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2016;54(5):836-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.25120 PMid:27015431
Eichinger K, Heatwole C, Heininger S, Stinson N, Matichak Stock C, Grosmann C, et al. Validity of the 6 minute walk test in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2017;55(3):333-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.25251 PMid:27421252 PMCid:PMC5793210
Elmahgoub SS, Van De Velde A, Peersman W, Cambier D, Calders P. Reproducibility, validity and predictors of six-minute walk test in overweight and obese adolescents with intellectual disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(10):846-51. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.623757 PMid:22149772
Fiss AL, Jeffries L, Yocum A, Westcott MS. Validity of the Early Activity Scale for Endurance and the 6-Minute Walk Test for Children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2019;31(2):156-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000577 PMid:30865148
Fulk GD, Echternach JL, Nof L, O'Sullivan S. Clinometric properties of the six-minute walk test in individuals undergoing rehabilitation poststroke. Physiother Theory Pract. 2008;24(3):195-04. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593980701588284 PMid:18569856
Guerra BM, Oviedo GR, Javierre C, Fortuño J, Barnet-López S, Niño O, et al. Reliability and validity of the 6-min walk test in adults and seniors with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2015;47:144-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.09.011 PMid:26426514
Gomes E, Bastos T, Probst M, Ribeiro JC, Silva G, Corredeira R. Reliability and validity of 6MWT for outpatients with schizophrenia: A preliminary study. Psychiatry Res. 2016; 237:37-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.01.066 PMid:26921049
Gulmans VA, Van Veldhoven NH, De Meer K, Helders PJ. The six-minute walking test in children with cystic fibrosis: reliability and validity. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1996; 22(2):85-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199608)22:2<85::AID-PPUL1>3.0.CO;2-I
Kobayashi E, Himuro N, Takahashi M. Clinical utility of the 6-min walk test for patients with moderate Parkinson's disease. Int J Rehabil Res. 2017;40(1):66-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000205 PMid:27977464
Larsson EU, Reynisdottir S. The six-minute walk test in outpatients with obesity: reproducibility and known group validity. Physiother Res Int. 2008;13(2):84-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.398 PMid:18446882
Lee MC. Validity of the 6-minute walk test and step test for evaluation of cardio respiratory fitness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Exerc Nutrition Biochem. 2018;22(1):49-55. https://doi.org/10.20463/jenb.2018.0008 PMid:29673246 PMCid:PMC5909078
Li AM, Yin J, Yu CC, Tsang T, So HK, Wong E, et al. The six-minute walk test in healthy children: reliability and validity. Eur Respir J. 2005;25(6):1057-60. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.05.00134904 PMid:15929962
Liu WY, Meijer K, Delbressine JM, Willems PJ, Franssen FM, Wouters EF, et al. Reproducibility and validity of the 6-Minute Walk Test using the Gait Real-Time Analysis Interactive Lab in patients with COPD and healthy elderly. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0162444. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162444 PMid:27607426 PMCid:PMC5015964
Mänttäri A, Suni J, Sievänen H, Husu P, Vähä-Ypyä H, Valkeinen H, et al. Six-minute walk test: a tool for predicting maximal aerobic power (VO2 max) in healthy adults. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12525 PMid:29851229
Mcdonald CM, Henricson EK, Abresch RT, Florence J, Eagle M, Gappmaier E, et al. The 6-minute walk test and other clinical endpoints in duchenne muscular dystrophy: reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal clinically important differences from a multicenter study. Muscle Nerve. 2013;48(3):357-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.23905 PMid:23674289 PMCid:PMC3826053
Moriello C, Mayo NE, Feldman L, Carli F. Validating the six-minute walk test as a measure of recovery after elective colon resection surgery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(6):1083-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.031 PMid:18503803
Morinder G, Mattsson E, Sollander C, Marcus C, Larsson UE. Six-minute walk test in obese children and adolescents: reproducibility and validity. Physiother Res Int. 2009;14(2):91-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.428 PMid:19003813
Mossberg KA, Fortini E. Responsiveness and validity of the six-minute walk test in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Phys Ther. 2012; 92(5):726-33. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20110157 PMid:22282772 PMCid:PMC3345338
Nasuti G, Stuart-Hill L, Temple VA. The Six-Minute Walk Test for adults with intellectual disability: a study of validity and reliability. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2013;38(1):31-8. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2012.748885 PMid:23244742
Nathan SD, du Bois RM, Albera C, Bradford WZ, Costabel U, Kartashov A, et al. Validation of test performance characteristics and minimal clinically important difference of the 6-minute walk test in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Med. 2015;109(7):914-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2015.04.008 PMid:25956020
Nsenga LA, Shephard RJ, Ahmaidi S. Six-minute walk test in children with cerebral palsy gross motor function classification system levels I and II: reproducibility, validity, and training effects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(12):2333-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.06.005 PMid:22721868
Pankoff B, Overend T, Lucy D, White K. Validity and responsiveness of the 6 minute walk test for people with fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(11):2666-70.
Pecorelli N, Fiore JF, Gillis C, Awasthi R, Mappin-Kasirer B, Niculiseanu P, et al. The six-minute walk test as a measure of postoperative recovery after colorectal resection: further examination of its measurement properties. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(6):2199-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4478-1 PMid:26310528
Phillips D, Tomazos LC, Moseley S, L'italien G, Silva HG, Lara SL. Reliability and validity of the 6-Minute Walk Test in hypophosphatasia. JBMR Plus. 2019;3(6):e10131. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10131 PMid:31346563 PMCid:PMC6636775
Ries JD, Echternach JL, Nof L, Blodgett MG. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change scores for the Timed "Up & Go" Test, the Six-Minute Walk Test, and Gait Speed in people with Alzheimer Disease. Phys Ther. 2009;89(6):569-79. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080258 PMid:19389792
Sandberg A, Cider Å, Jivegård L, Nordanstig J, Wittboldt S, Bäck M. Test-retest reliability, agreement, and minimal detectable change in the 6-minute walk test in patients with intermittent claudication. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71(1):197-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.056 PMid:31147129
Sanjak M, Langford V, Holsten S, Rozario N, Patterson CGM, Bravver E, et al. Six-Minute Walk Test as a measure of walking capacity in ambulatory individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(11):2301-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.04.004 PMid:28465220
Schmidt K, Vogt L, Thiel C, Jäger E, Banzer W. Validity of the six-minute walk test in cancer patients. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34(7):631-6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1323746 PMid:23444095
Scivoletto G, Tamburella F, Laurenza L, Foti C, Ditunno JF, Molinari M. Validity and reliability of the 10-m walk test and the 6-min walk test in spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord. 2011;49(6):736-40. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2010.180 PMid:21221120
Sinclair RCF, Batterham AM, Davies S, Cawthorn L, Danjoux GR. Validity of the 6 min walk test in prediction of the anaerobic threshold before major non-cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(1):30-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer322 PMid:21980122
Stellmann JP, Neuhaus A, Götze N, Briken S, Lederer C, Schimpl M, et al. Ecological validity of walking capacity tests in multiple sclerosis. PloS One. 2015;10(4):e0123822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123822 PMid:25879750 PMCid:PMC4399985
Takken T, Engelbert R, Van Bergen M, Groothoff J, Nauta J, Van Hoeck K, et al. Six-minute walking test in children with ESRD: discrimination validity and construct validity. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009;24(11):2217-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-009-1259-x PMid:19633871 PMCid:PMC2753769
Uszko-Lencer NHMK, Mesquita R, Janssen E, Werter C, Brunner-La RHP, Pitta F, et al. Reliability, construct validity and determinants of 6-minute walk test performance in patients with chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2017;240:285-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.109 PMid:28377186
Vanhelst J, Fardy PS, Salleron J, Béghin L. The six-minute walk test in obese youth: reproducibility, validity, and prediction equation to assess aerobic power. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(6):479-82. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.699581 PMid:22779759
Vis JC, Thoonsen H, Duffels MG, De Bruin-Bom RA, Huisman SA, Van Dijk AP, et al. Six-minute walk test in patients with Down syndrome: validity and reproducibility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(8):1423-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.015 PMid:19651279
Arjunan A, Peel NM, Hubbard RE. Gait speed and frailty status in relation to adverse outcomes in geriatric rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(5):859-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.08.187 PMid:30312596
Bloem AEM, Veltkamp M, Spruit MA, Custers JWH, Bakker EWP, Dolk HM, et al. Validation of 4-meter-gait-speed test and 5-repetitions-sit-to-stand test in patients with pulmonary fibrosis: a clinimetric validation study. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2018;35(4):317-326. doi: https://doi.org/10.36141/svdld.v35i4.7035
Boonstra AM, Fidler V, Eisma WH. Walking speemtmmkubjects and amputees: aspects of validity of gait analysis. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1993;17(2):78-82. https://doi.org/10.3109/03093649309164360 PMid:8233772
Combs AS, Diehl MD, Filip J, Long E. Short-distance walking speed tests in people with Parkinson disease: Reliability, responsiveness, and validity. Gait Posture. 2014;39(2):784-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.10.019 PMid:24246801
Dolmage TE, Evans RA, Goldstein RS. Validity of measurement in patients with severe chronic lung disease, including prognostic and practical implications. CHEST. 2017;153(5):1101-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.11.024 PMid:29222008
Kim HJ, Park Y, Lee HJ. The reliability and validity of gait speed with different walking pace and distances against general health, physical function, and chronic disease in aged adults. J Exerc Nutrition Biochem. 2016;20(3):46-50. https://doi.org/10.20463/jenb.2016.09.20.3.7 PMid:27757387 PMCid:PMC5067420
Kon SS, Patel MS, Canavan JL, Clark AL, Jones SE, Nolan CM, et al. Reliability and validity of 4-metre gait speed in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2013;42(2):333-40. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00162712 PMid:23222875
Nolan CM, Maddocks M, Maher TM, Canavan JL, Jones SE, Barker RE, et al. Phenotypic characteristics associated with slow gait speed in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respirology. 2018;23(5):498-506. https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.13213 PMid:29139195
Peters DM, Fritz SL, Krotish DE. Assessing the reliability and validity of a shorter walk test compared with the 10-Meter Walk Test for measurements of gait speed in healthy, older adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2013;36(1):24-30. https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0b013e318248e20d PMid:22415358
Reychler G, Audag N, Dewulf S, Morale MN, Caty G. Validation of 6 min step test and 4-m gait speed in children: A randomized cross-over study. Gait Posture. 2018;61:19-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.12.011 PMid:29289866
Van Loo MA, Moseley AM, Bosman JM, De Bie RA, Hassett L. Inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of walking speed measurement after traumatic brain injury. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(7):775-9. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215503cr677oa PMid:14606745
Arcuri JF, Borghi-Silva A, Labadessa IG, Sentanin AC, Candolo C, Pires Di Lorenzo VA. Validity and reliability of the 6-Minute Step Test in healthy individuals: a cross-sectional study. Clin J Sport Med. 2016;26(1):69-75. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000190 PMid:25706661
Bonnevie T, Allingham M, Prieur G, Combret Y, Debeaumont D, Patout M, et al. The six-minute stepper test is related to muscle strength but cannot substitute for the one repetition maximum to prescribe strength training in patients with COPD. International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2019;14:767-774. https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S193585 PMid:30992662 PMCid:PMC6445245
Chung MM, Chan RW, Fung, YK, Fong SS, Lam SS, Lai CW, et al. Reliability and validity of Alternate Step Test times in subjects with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(10):969-74. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1877 PMid:25167536
Cooney JK, Moore JP, Ahmad YA, Jones JG, Lemmey AB, Casanova F, et al. A simple step test to estimate cardio-respiratory fitness levels of rheumatoid arthritis patients in a clinical setting. Int J Rheumatol. 2013;2013:174541. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/174541 PMid:24454385 PMCid:PMC3884971
Hayes RM, Maldonado D, Gossett T, Shepherd T, Mehta SP, Flesher SL. Developing and validating a step test of aerobic fitness among elementary school children. Physiother Can. 2019;71(2):187-94. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2017-44.pp PMid:31040514 PMCid:PMC6484966
Hong SJ, Goh EY, Chua SY, Ng SS. Reliability and validity of step test scores in subjects with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(6):1065-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.022 PMid:22475055
Knight E, Stuckey MI, Petrella RJ. Validation of the Step Test and Exercise Prescription Tool for adults. Can J Diabetes, 2014;38(3):164-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.03.007 PMid:24909087
Miyamoto K, Takebayashi H, Takimoto K, Miyamoto S, Morioka S, Yagi F. A new simple performance test focused on agility in elderly people: The Ten Step Test. Gerontology. 2008;54(6):365-72. https://doi.org/10.1159/000146787 PMid:18645242
Pessoa BV, Arcuri JF, Labadessa IG, Costa JNF, Sentanin AC, Pires VA, et al. Validity of the six-minute step test of free cadence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014;18(3):228-36. https://doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0041 PMid:25003275 PMCid:PMC4183495
Di Thommazo-Luporini L, Carvalho LP, Luporini RL, Trimer R, Pantoni CB, Martinez AF, et al. Are cardiovascular and metabolic responses to field walking tests interchangeable and obesity-dependent? Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(18):1820-9. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1107645 PMid:26681386
Travensolo CF, Arcuri JF, Polito MD. Validity and reliability of the 6-min step test in individuals with coronary artery disease. Physiother Res Int. 2020;25(1):e1810. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1810 PMid:31599079
Bruun IH, Mogensen CB, Nørgaard B, Schiøttz-Christensen B, Maribo T. Validity and responsiveness to change of the 30-Second Chair-Stand Test in older adults admitted to an emergency department. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2019;42(4):265-74. https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000166 PMid:29227412
Crook S, Büsching G, Schultz K, Lehbert N, Jelusic D, Keusch S, et al. A multicentre validation of the 1-min sit-to-stand test in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(3):1601871. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01871-2016 PMid:28254766
Goldberg A, Chavis M, Watkins J, Wilson T. The five-times-sit-to-stand test: validity, reliability and detectable change in older females. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012;24(4):339-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325265 PMid:23238309
Jones JC, Rikli RE, Beam WC. A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1999;70(2):113-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1999.10608028 PMid:10380242
Jones SE, Kon SS, Canavan JL, Patel MS, Clark AL, Nolan CM, et al. The five-repetition sit-to-stand test as a functional outcome measure in COPD. Thorax. 2013;68(11):1015-20. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-203576 PMid:23783372
Kohlbrenner D, Benden C, Radtke T. The 1-minute sit-to-stand test in lung transplant candidates: an easy-to-use alternative to the 6-minute walk test? Respir Care. 2020;65(4):437-43. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.07124 PMid:31641072
Kumban W, Amatachaya S, Emasithi A, Siritaratiwat W. Five-times-sit-to-stand test in children with cerebral palsy: reliability and concurrent validity. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;32(1):9-15. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-130818 PMid:23422454
Mcallister LS, Palombaro KM. Modified 30-second sit-to-stand test: reliability and validity in older adults unable to complete traditional sit-to-stand testing. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2020;43(3):153-8. https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000227 PMid:30807554
Møller AB, Bibby BM, Skjerbæk AG, Jensen E, Sørensen H, Stenager E, et al. Validity and variability of the 5-repetition sit-to-stand test in patients with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(26):2251-8. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.683479 PMid:22612360
Mong Y, Teo TW, Ng SS. 5-repetition sit-to-stand test in subjects with chronic stroke: reliability and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(3):407-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.030 PMid:20298832
Nilsagård Y, Andreasson M, Carling A, Vesterlin H. Examining the validity and sensitivity to change of the 5 and 10 sit-to-stand tests in people with multiple sclerosis. Physiother Res Int. 2017;22(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1681 PMid:28044398
Staartjes VE, Schröder ML. The five-repetition sit-to-stand test: evaluation of a simple -and objective tool for the assessment of degenerative pathologies of the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;29(4):380-7. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.2.SPINE171416 PMid:29957147
Wang TH, Liao HF, Peng YC. Reliability and validity of the five-repetition sit-to-stand test for children with cerebral palsy. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(7):664-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215511426889 PMid:22080526
Botolfsen P, Helbostad JL, Moe-Nilssen R, Wall JC. Reliability and concurrent validity of the Expanded Timed Up-and-Go test in older people with impaired mobility. Physiother Res Int. 2008;13(2):94-106. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.394 PMid:18288773
Chan PP, Si Tou JI, Tse MM, Ng SS. Reliability and validity of the Timed Up and Go Test with a motor task in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(11):2213-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.008 PMid:28392324
Evensen NM, Kvåle A, Brækken IH. Convergent validity of the Timed Up and Go test and Ten-metre Timed Walk Test in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain. Manual Therapy, 2015; 21:94-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2015.06.002 PMid:26235131
Gautschi OP, Smoll NR, Corniola MV, Joswig H, Chau I, Hildebrandt G, et al. Validity and reliability of a measurement of objective functional impairment in lumbar degenerative disc disease: The Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test. Neurosurgery. 2016;79(2):270-7. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001195 PMid:26702840
Hwang R, Morris NR, Mandrusiak A, Mudge A, Suna J, Adsett J, et al. Timed Up and Go test: a reliable and valid test in patients with chronic heart failure. J Card Fail. 2016; 22(8):646-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.09.018 PMid:26456063
Kalron A, Dolev M, Givon U. Further construct validity of the Timed Up-and-Go Test as a measure of ambulation in multiple sclerosis patients. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(6):841-7. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04599-3
Kojima T, Ishikawa H, Tanaka S, Haga N, Nishida K, Yukioka M, et al. Validation and reliability of the Timed Up and Go test for measuring objective functional impairment in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study. Int J Rheum Dis. 2018;21(10):1793-800. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.13237 PMid:29210204
Mesquita R, Janssen DJ, Wouters EF, Schols JM, Pitta F, Spruit MA. Within-day test-retest reliability of the Timed Up & Go test in patients with advanced chronic organ failure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(11):2131-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.024 PMid:23583345
Nicolini-Panisson RD, Donadio MV. Normative values for the Timed 'Up and Go' test in children and adolescents and validation for individuals with Down syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56(5):490-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12290 PMid:24206424
Rolenz E, Reneker JC. Validity of the 8-Foot Up and Go, Timed Up and Go, and Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale in older adults with and without cognitive impairment. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(4):511-518. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2015.03.0042 PMid:27532337
Schoppen T, Boonstra A, Groothoff JW, De Vries J, Göeken LN, Eisma WH. The Timed "up and go" test: reliability and validity in persons with unilateral lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(7):825-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90234-4
Sebastião E, Sandroff BM, Learmonth YC, Motl RW. Validity of the Timed Up and Go Test as a measure of functional mobility in persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(7):1072-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.031 PMid:26944709
Ito T. Comprehensive physical function assessment in elderly people. Clin Phys Ther. 2017. https://doi.org/10.5772/67528
Christakou A, Papadopoulos E, Patsaki I, Sidiras G, Nanas S. Functional Assessment Scales in a General Intensive Care Unit. A Review. Hospital Chronicles. 2013;8(4):164-170.
Heresi GA, Dweik RA. Strengths and limitations of the Six-Minute-Walk Test: a model biomarker study in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(9):1122-4. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201012-2079ED PMid:21531951
Novaes RD, Miranda AS, Dourado VZ. Velocidade usual da marcha em brasileiros de meia idade e idosos. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011;15(2):117-22. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552011000200006 PMid:21789361
Keat BM, Guck TP, McGaha AL. Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test: normative reference values for ages 20 to 59 years and relationships with physical and mental health risk factors. J Prim Care Community Health. 2017;8(1):9-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150131916659282 PMid:27450179 PMCid:PMC5932649
Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT) [Internet]. Teste da Caminhada e do Degrau. Temas em revisão, 2011 [uploaded Dec 2011; cited 2020 Oct 31]. Avaiable from: http://itarget.com.br/newclients/sbpt.org.br/2011/downloads/arquivos/Revisoes/REVISAO_06_TESTE_CAMINHADA_DEGRAU.pdf