Effect of different manipulations of the cluster-set method on training volume and time under tension in resistance training men

Main Article Content

Ricardo Reis Dinardi
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7457-2939
Frank Douglas Tourino
Lucas Túlio de Lacerda
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0735-8131
João Batista Ferreira-Júnior
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7541-8212
Hugo César Martins-Costa
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0851-4730

Abstract

Objective: To compare the acute effect of two training protocols until concentric failure (CF) with different intra-set interval (ISI) configurations (20 s and 40 s) on total weight, the total number of repetitions, and time under tension in trained subjects. Methods: Ten men participated in the study (age = 25.1 ± 4.4 years; body mass = 76.5 ± 10.4 kg; height = 175.8 ± 9.3 cm). Two protocols were performed with 4 sets of bench press exercises and differentiated by the ISI: i) Protocol ISI-40 (40 s) - each set consisted of 6 repetitions followed by an ISI of 40 s and completed with repetitions up to CF; ii) Protocol ISI-20 (20 s) - each set consisted of 6 repetitions with ISI of 20 s every 3 repetitions followed by repetitions to CF. The intensity was 10 repetitions maximum, and the rest interval between sets of 80 s. A minimum interval of 48 h was adopted between protocols. Results: There was no significant difference in the number of repetitions (p = 0.074), in the time under tension (p = 0.353) and in the total volume (p = 0.083) between the protocols. Conclusion: The results indicate that the different ISI configurations did not distinctly influence the number of repetitions, time under tension, and total volume.



Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Dinardi RR, Tourino FD, de Lacerda LT, Ferreira-Júnior JB, Martins-Costa HC. Effect of different manipulations of the cluster-set method on training volume and time under tension in resistance training men. HSJ [Internet]. 2022 Aug. 31 [cited 2024 Dec. 26];12(3):29-34. Available from: https://portalrcs.hcitajuba.org.br/index.php/rcsfmit_zero/article/view/1239
Section
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Author Biographies

Ricardo Reis Dinardi, Study and Research Group on Physical Conditioning. Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais (GEPCOFI/PUC-MG)

Professor Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Doctor in Health Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Frank Douglas Tourino, Study and Research Group on Physical Conditioning. Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais (GEPCOFI/PUC-MG)

Master in Sports Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Lucas Túlio de Lacerda, State University of Minas Gerais (UEMG)

Doctor in Sports Science from the Federal University of Minas Gerais. Professor at the State University of Minas Gerais. Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

João Batista Ferreira-Júnior, Federal Institute of the Southeast of Minas Gerais

Doctor in Health Sciences, University of Brasília. Professor at the Federal Institute of the Southeast of Minas Gerais, Campus Rio Pomba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Hugo César Martins-Costa, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais

Doctor in Sport Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais. Professor at the Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

References

Fleck SJ, Kraemer WJ. Fundamentos do Treinamento de Força Muscular. 4ª. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2017.

Zakharov A, Gomes AC. Ciência do treinamento desportivo. Rio de Janeiro: Grupo Palestra Sport; 2003.

Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(4):674-88. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000121945.36635.61 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000121945.36635.61

American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(3):687-708. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670

Silva-Grigoletto M, Valverde-Esteve T, Brito CJ, García-Manso JM. Capacidade de repetição da força: efeito das recuperações interséries. Rev Bras Educ Fís Esportes. 2013;20:796-802. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-55092013005000016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-55092013005000016

García-Ramos A, Nebot V, Padial P, Valverde-Esteve T, Pablos-Monzó A, Feriche B. Effects of short inter-repetition rest periods on power output losses during the half squat exercise. Isokinect Exerc Sci. 2016;24(4):323-30. https://doi.org/10.3233/IES-160634 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IES-160634

Tufano JJ, Conlon JA, Nimphius S, Brown LE, Petkovic A, Frick J, et al. Effects of cluster-sets and rest redistribution on mechanical responses to back sqauts in trained men. J Hum Kinet. 2017;58:35-43. https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0069

Lawton TW, Cronin JB, Lindsell RP. Effect of interrepetition rest intervals on weight training repetition power output. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(1): 172-6. https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200602000-00028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200602000-00028

Marshall PWM, Robbins DA, Wrightson AW, Siegler JC. Acute neuromuscular and fatigue responses to the rest-pause method. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15:153-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2011.08.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2011.08.003

Korak JA, Paquette MR, Fuller DK, Caputo JL, Coons JM. Effect of a rest-pause vs. traditional squat on electromyography and lifting volume in trained women. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018;118(7):1309-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3863-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3863-6

Burd NA, West DWD, Staples AW, Atherton PJ, Baker JM, Moore DR, et al. Low-load high volume resistance exercise stimulates muscle protein synthesis more than high-load low volume resistance exercise in young men. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(8):e12033. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012033

Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn D, Krieger JW. Dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training volume and increases in muscle mass: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 2017;35(11):1073-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1210197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1210197

Denton J, Cronin JB. Kinematic, kinetic, and blood lactate profiles of continuous and intraset rest loading schemes. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(3):528-34. https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200608000-00012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200608000-00012

Iglesias-Soler E, Carballeira E, Sánchez-Otero T, Mayo X, Fernández-Del-Omo M. Performance of maximum repetitions with cluster-set configuration. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9(4):637-42. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2013-0246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2013-0246

Prestes J, Tibana RA, Sousa EA, Nascimento DC, Rocha PO, Camarço NF, et al. Strength and muscular adaptations after 6 weeks of rest-pause vs. traditional multiple-sets resistance training in trained subjects. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33 Suppl 1:S113-S21. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001923 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001923

Aravena-Sagardia P, García-Sandoval A, Barramuño M, Herrera-Valenzuela T, Magnani B. Effects of intra-set rest on morphological variables, maximal strength and jump performance in university students. Int. J. Morphol. 2021;39(1):274-81. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022021000100274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022021000100274

Moir GL, Graham BW, Davis SE, Guers JJ, Witmer CA. Effect of cluster set configurations on mechanical variables during the deadlift exercise. J Hum Kinet. 2013;39:15-23. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2013-0064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2013-0064

Ho IMK, Luk JTC, Ngo JK, Wong DP. Effects of different intraset rest durations on lifting performance and self-perceived exertion during bench press exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2021;35(8):2114-20. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003101

Girman JC, Jones MT, Matthews TD, Wood RJ. Acute effects of a cluster-set protocol on hormonal, metabolic and performance measures in resistance-trained males. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(2):151-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2013.775351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2013.775351

Maia M, Willardson J, Paz G, Miranda H. Effects of different rest intervals between antagonists paired sets on repetition performance and muscle activation. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(9):2529-2535. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000451

Rhea MR. Determining the magnitude of treatment effects in strength training research through the use of the effect size. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18:918-920. https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200411000-00040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200411000-00040

Hardee JP, Lawrence MM, Utter AC, Triplett NT, Zwetsloot KA, Mcbride JM. Effect of inter-repetition rest on ratings of perceived exertion during multiple sets of the power clean. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:3141-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2300-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2300-x

Di Prampero PE, Margaria R. Relationship between O2 consumption, high energy phosphates and the kinetics of the O2 debt in exercise. Pflügers Archiv. 1968;304(1):11-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00586714 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00586714

Meyer RA, Terjung RL. Differences in ammonia and adenylate metabolism in contracting fast and slow muscle. Am J Physiol. 1979;237(3):C111-8. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.1979.237.3.C111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.1979.237.3.C111

Most read articles by the same author(s)