Effect of different manipulations of the cluster-set method on training volume and time under tension in resistance training men
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To compare the acute effect of two training protocols until concentric failure (CF) with different intra-set interval (ISI) configurations (20 s and 40 s) on total weight, the total number of repetitions, and time under tension in trained subjects. Methods: Ten men participated in the study (age = 25.1 ± 4.4 years; body mass = 76.5 ± 10.4 kg; height = 175.8 ± 9.3 cm). Two protocols were performed with 4 sets of bench press exercises and differentiated by the ISI: i) Protocol ISI-40 (40 s) - each set consisted of 6 repetitions followed by an ISI of 40 s and completed with repetitions up to CF; ii) Protocol ISI-20 (20 s) - each set consisted of 6 repetitions with ISI of 20 s every 3 repetitions followed by repetitions to CF. The intensity was 10 repetitions maximum, and the rest interval between sets of 80 s. A minimum interval of 48 h was adopted between protocols. Results: There was no significant difference in the number of repetitions (p = 0.074), in the time under tension (p = 0.353) and in the total volume (p = 0.083) between the protocols. Conclusion: The results indicate that the different ISI configurations did not distinctly influence the number of repetitions, time under tension, and total volume.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors maintain copyright and grant the Health Sciences Journal the right to first publication. From 2024, the publications wiil be licensed under Attribution 4.0 International 
, allowing their sharing, recognizing the authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point after the editorial process.
Also, the AUTHOR is informed and consents that the Health Sciences Journal can incorporate his article into existing or future scientific databases and indexers, under the conditions defined by the latter at all times, which will involve, at least, the possibility that the holders of these databases can perform the following actions on the article.
References
2. Zakharov A, Gomes AC. Ciência do treinamento desportivo. Rio de Janeiro: Grupo Palestra Sport; 2003.
3. Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(4):674-88. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000121945.36635.61
4. American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(3):687-708. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670
5. Silva-Grigoletto M, Valverde-Esteve T, Brito CJ, García-Manso JM. Capacidade de repetição da força: efeito das recuperações interséries. Rev Bras Educ Fís Esportes. 2013;20:796-802. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-55092013005000016
6. García-Ramos A, Nebot V, Padial P, Valverde-Esteve T, Pablos-Monzó A, Feriche B. Effects of short inter-repetition rest periods on power output losses during the half squat exercise. Isokinect Exerc Sci. 2016;24(4):323-30. https://doi.org/10.3233/IES-160634
7. Tufano JJ, Conlon JA, Nimphius S, Brown LE, Petkovic A, Frick J, et al. Effects of cluster-sets and rest redistribution on mechanical responses to back sqauts in trained men. J Hum Kinet. 2017;58:35-43. https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0069
8. Lawton TW, Cronin JB, Lindsell RP. Effect of interrepetition rest intervals on weight training repetition power output. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(1): 172-6. https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200602000-00028
9. Marshall PWM, Robbins DA, Wrightson AW, Siegler JC. Acute neuromuscular and fatigue responses to the rest-pause method. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15:153-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2011.08.003
10. Korak JA, Paquette MR, Fuller DK, Caputo JL, Coons JM. Effect of a rest-pause vs. traditional squat on electromyography and lifting volume in trained women. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018;118(7):1309-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3863-6
11. Burd NA, West DWD, Staples AW, Atherton PJ, Baker JM, Moore DR, et al. Low-load high volume resistance exercise stimulates muscle protein synthesis more than high-load low volume resistance exercise in young men. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(8):e12033. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012033
12. Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn D, Krieger JW. Dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training volume and increases in muscle mass: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 2017;35(11):1073-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1210197
13. Denton J, Cronin JB. Kinematic, kinetic, and blood lactate profiles of continuous and intraset rest loading schemes. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(3):528-34. https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200608000-00012
14. Iglesias-Soler E, Carballeira E, Sánchez-Otero T, Mayo X, Fernández-Del-Omo M. Performance of maximum repetitions with cluster-set configuration. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9(4):637-42. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2013-0246
15. Prestes J, Tibana RA, Sousa EA, Nascimento DC, Rocha PO, Camarço NF, et al. Strength and muscular adaptations after 6 weeks of rest-pause vs. traditional multiple-sets resistance training in trained subjects. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33 Suppl 1:S113-S21. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001923
16. Aravena-Sagardia P, García-Sandoval A, Barramuño M, Herrera-Valenzuela T, Magnani B. Effects of intra-set rest on morphological variables, maximal strength and jump performance in university students. Int. J. Morphol. 2021;39(1):274-81. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022021000100274
17. Moir GL, Graham BW, Davis SE, Guers JJ, Witmer CA. Effect of cluster set configurations on mechanical variables during the deadlift exercise. J Hum Kinet. 2013;39:15-23. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2013-0064
18. Ho IMK, Luk JTC, Ngo JK, Wong DP. Effects of different intraset rest durations on lifting performance and self-perceived exertion during bench press exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2021;35(8):2114-20. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003101
19. Girman JC, Jones MT, Matthews TD, Wood RJ. Acute effects of a cluster-set protocol on hormonal, metabolic and performance measures in resistance-trained males. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(2):151-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2013.775351
20. Maia M, Willardson J, Paz G, Miranda H. Effects of different rest intervals between antagonists paired sets on repetition performance and muscle activation. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(9):2529-2535. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000451
21. Rhea MR. Determining the magnitude of treatment effects in strength training research through the use of the effect size. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18:918-920. https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200411000-00040
22. Hardee JP, Lawrence MM, Utter AC, Triplett NT, Zwetsloot KA, Mcbride JM. Effect of inter-repetition rest on ratings of perceived exertion during multiple sets of the power clean. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:3141-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2300-x
23. Di Prampero PE, Margaria R. Relationship between O2 consumption, high energy phosphates and the kinetics of the O2 debt in exercise. Pflügers Archiv. 1968;304(1):11-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00586714
24. Meyer RA, Terjung RL. Differences in ammonia and adenylate metabolism in contracting fast and slow muscle. Am J Physiol. 1979;237(3):C111-8. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.1979.237.3.C111